Offsite manufacturing and standardised design
Contents |
[edit] Introduction
The UK construction industry is facing two key issues: a skills shortage and an increasing demand for improved infrastructure.
The 2016 government-commissioned Farmer review identified that the number of skilled workers in the industry is likely to decline by at least 20% over the next decade.
Offsite construction using standardised factory-made components has the potential to reduce the current risks to future infrastructure delivery. As seen in the housing sector it offers shorter programmes and reduced costs coupled with higher outputs and more consistent quality. The reduction of head-count on site also improves health and safety.
But though offsite is well suited to large housing schemes the often linear nature of infrastructure projects and programmes and their greater geographical spread are perceived as barriers to offsite delivery.
[edit] Need for standard designs
Traditionally bridges, retaining walls and other transport infrastructure assets are designed on a bespoke, site-specific basis. As a result, there is a lack of repetition.
Motorway gantries are a good example of where standardisation has been possible allowing the benefits of offsite fabrication to be realised. Standard design families have been created that are adjustable for specific locations but allow automated design and manufacturing processes, which in turn improves buildability and reduces cost.
Similar processes could be used for road and rail bridge construction – but there is added complexity due to greater variation in loading, geometry and aesthetic influences. Geotechnical interactions can also be diverse, particularly where integral construction leads to complex soil-structure interaction.
To realise the benefits of offsite for infrastructure, a compromise is needed from what might traditionally have been considered an ‘optimised design’. Small concessions made in designing bridges to standard skews, or to modules of fixed span length, will most likely be offset by productivity benefits. It would allow the use of standardised components (including multiple-use of expensive precast moulds), that lend themselves to automated digital engineering, manufacturing and traceability.
[edit] Attractive working environments
Offsite also enables many construction activities to be moved into climate-controlled, dry factories that are safe and pleasant places to work in compared to remote, weather-exposed site locations. In time this could lead to a growing number of construction workers, with the industry once again becoming attractive.
There is also great potential to minimise exposure of the workforce to road and rail traffic and associated safety hazards. Issues such as lifting heavy manufactured units and temporarily stabilising them during assembly need to be carefully addressed, but familiarisation and practice will bring its own safety benefits.
As well as greater education on how the industry can further utilise offsite construction, close collaboration in the design process between clients, designers, contractors and manufacturers is also important.
With a move towards increased early contractor involvement as a form of procurement, and the opportunities currently presented by the major infrastructure projects in the UK, the civil engineering industry is now at a point where it can and must seize the opportunity to change and modernise. This means adopting standardised offsite construction.
This article was originally published here on 24 Jan 2018 by ICE. It was written by John Armitage, Ramboll.
--The Institution of Civil Engineers
[edit] Related articles on Designing Buildings Wiki
- Articles by ICE on Designing Buildings Wiki.
- Building Skills for Offsite Construction.
- Design for Manufacture and Assembly (DfMA).
- How to make projects off-site ready.
- Modular buildings.
- Off-site construction.
- Off site, on track.
- Off-site prefabrication of buildings: A guide to connection choices.
- Offsite manufacturing.
- Platform approach to design for manufacture and assembly.
- Prefabrication.
Featured articles and news
Reasons for using MVHR systems
6 reasons for a whole-house approach to ventilation.
Supplementary Planning Documents, a reminder
As used by the City of London to introduce a Retrofit first policy.
The what, how, why and when of deposit return schemes
Circular economy steps for plastic bottles and cans in England and Northern Ireland draws.
Join forces and share Building Safety knowledge in 2025
Why and how to contribute to the Building Safety Wiki.
Reporting on Payment Practices and Performance Regs
Approved amendment coming into effect 1 March 2025.
A new CIOB TIS on discharging CDM 2015 duties
Practical steps that can be undertaken in the Management of Contractors to discharge the relevant CDM 2015 duties.
Planning for homes by transport hubs
Next steps for infrastructure following the updated NPPF.
Access, history and Ty unnos.
The world’s first publicly funded civic park.
Exploring permitted development rights for change of use
Discussing lesser known classes M, N, P, PA and L.
CIOB Art of Building 2024 judges choice winner
Once Upon a Pass by Liam Man.
CIOB Art of Building 2024 public choice winner
Fresco School by Roman Robroek.
HE expands finance alliance to boost SME house building
Project follows on from Habiko public-private place making pension partnership for affordable housing delivery.
Licensing construction; looking back to look forward
Voluntary to required contractors (licensing) schemes.
A contractor discusses the Building Safety Act
A brief to the point look at changes that have occurred.
How orchards can influence planning and development.